![]() I personally followed its development and see nothing Wikipedia-worthy in it it is a mod like many others. I believe such a mention is undue, if not free advertisement. Shaddim ( talk) 17:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC) Reply I disagree. honored by moddb as one of 12 mods overall, the best of the best i think to mention this mod as example (for the many) in this article is acceptable, as at the moment there is nothing about modding overall mentioned. Tuxide ( talk) 20:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Reply for the complex mod the situation is a little bit different as this specific one was critical acclaimed. Why it is not mentioned? -Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.141.92.169 ( talk) 13:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Reply You will find your answer on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HW2: Pirates Mod. Homeworld Complex is such a good and mature expansion. KajiTetsushi 06:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Reply I also suggest a curtail or a separated article for the background story of Homeworld 2 - it is too long for anyone to read. ![]() Regards, Tuxide 06:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Reply Agreed. Another idea is to see how the featured article Final Fantasy VII throws quotations into the References section. The quotes section can be removed entirely Wikipedia is no place for adding flavor text to encyclopedia articles. KajiTetsushi 06:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Reply I concur with forking the ships section into a new list article, such as List of ships in Homeworld 2, whatever. Have this article rearranged or I will shorten it personally. it's way over wikipedia recommended length and realisticly the main article shouldn't level of depth, it really needs to be split. All the information on ships, races and mods is too much for the main article. This article is too long and desperately needs to be split up. Regards, Tuxide 02:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Reply Not trying to start something over HW2 mods, just saying that they are a significant part of why the game is still noteworthy, and that a person who came to this page looking for more information about the game would probably want to see at least a link to a site that catalogs mods- 24.58.181.89 00:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Reply I have answered your question on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/HW2: Pirates Mod in a nutshell it's about WP:N and WP:V. Without them, the game itself would barely be considered sufficiently noteworthy to justify having an article about it in 2007. The mods are noteworthy in that they a good part of what keeps the game relevant today. Regards, Tuxide 00:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Reply True, though HW2 never had a massive following as other games released around the same time did. There is a difference between "interesting" (or "useful") and "importance" here. As a player (not a mod/map maker) I found it useful to have some links to mod sites and mod descriptions - 24.58.181.89 23:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Reply Īs per WP:NOT and WP:N, this is an encyclopedia article, not an indiscriminate collection of links.Since I suspect mod makers are adding themselves in for promotional purposes.Ĩ7.81.110.119 13:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Reply But they're currently included as links not citations.Īlso the community really needs to decide which mods are actually notable. I got the impressions some of the links in the mod section could be the citation's needed like for example the forum thread regarding the EVE online mod. Basically the MOD section was reading too much like an advertisment for how good these mods are going to be when finished. And I've also gone through the mod section and toned down a lot of the POV statements. I've added some more balanced review data, a load of citation tags where statements need backup or to be removed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |